cold-flash: correct chip/soc name
RX-51/N900 has OMAP3430, and it seems this is what the ASIC ID field at offset 4 refers to. Fix the comment and printf.
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
22f71b0f25
commit
f5a9d273ce
1 file changed
+2
-2
+2
-2
@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ int init_cold_flash(struct usb_device_info * dev) {
|
||||
if ( memcmp(asic_buffer+1, "\x01\x05\x01", 3) != 0 )
|
||||
ERROR_RETURN("Invalid ASIC ID", -1);
|
||||
|
||||
/* ID Subblock - OMAP chip version (check for OMAP35x) */
|
||||
/* ID Subblock - OMAP chip version (check for OMAP3430) */
|
||||
if ( memcmp(asic_buffer+4, "\x34\x30\x07", 3) != 0 )
|
||||
ERROR_RETURN("Invalid ASIC ID", -1);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ int init_cold_flash(struct usb_device_info * dev) {
|
||||
if ( memcmp(asic_buffer+58, "\x15\x09\x01", 3) != 0 )
|
||||
ERROR_RETURN("Invalid ASIC ID", -1);
|
||||
|
||||
printf("Detected OMAP35x chip\n");
|
||||
printf("Detected OMAP3430 chip\n");
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user